- Published on
Best Test Management Tools for Smaller Projects
- Authors
- Name
- Adam Piskorek
- @hvitis_
3 Best Tools - How I Picked them and Why
The search was not easy as I was open to pretty much any test management software there is. Big names like JIRA and Azure Dev Ops are also great choices but I was looking for something that can provide API for automation and can be set up for free within 15 minutes.
Having said that I have checked also test management tools for JIRA and made a comparison matrix.
The full list of criterias I was considering is:
| Name | Pricing | Integration | Integration | Test Cases | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTrack | API / WebHooks | ||||
| Qase | 💸/💰💰 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Tuskr | 💸/💰 | 🔴 | ✅ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testiny | 💸/💰 | 🔴 | ✅ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testomat | 💰 | paid only | ✅ | Cloud | |
| Kualitee | 💰 | 🔴 | ✅ | ✅ | Cloud |
| EasyQA | 💰 | ✅ | 🟠 | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testpad | 💰 | 🔴 | ✅ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testrail | 💰💰💰💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Inflectra | 💰💰💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testmonitor | 💰💰💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Teststuff | 💰💰💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testmo | 💰💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Testlodge | 💰💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Cloud |
| Gemini | 💰 | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Standalone Microsoft |
| Tarantula | Open Source (not suported) | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Standalone |
| TestLink | Open Source | 🔴 | ❓ | ✅ | Standalone |
| Zephyr | 💰💰 | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | JIRA Addon |
| Nitrate | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| TestCollab | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| QACoverage | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| XQual | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| Qucate | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| TestFLO for JIRA | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| JunoOne | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| Klaros-Testmanagement | ❓ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ | ❓ |
| Bugsee | ❓ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔴 | ❓ |
| QATouch | 🔴 |
| Name | Reports | Look & Feel | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qase | ✅/Paid | 🟢🟢🟢 | good UI, API integration only on the paid tier, $17 per user/month with no minimum limit, history limit on the free version (deleting reports?), manual reports on the free version |
| Tuskr | ✅ | 🟢🟢 | |
| Testiny | ✅ | 🟢 | |
| Testomat | ✅ | Paid API integration | |
| Kualitee | ✅ | 🟠 | Very bad UI |
| EasyQA | ✅ | 🟠 | Not available anymore. Page down |
| Testpad | ✅ | 🟠 | Not intuitive UI |
| Testrail | ✅ | ❓ | Super expensive |
| Inflectra | ✅ | ❓ | |
| Testmonitor | ✅ | ❓ | |
| Teststuff | ✅ | ❓ | |
| Testmo | ✅ | ❓ | |
| Testlodge | ✅ | 🟠 | |
| Gemini | ✅ | 🟠 | Standalone, terrible UI, Microsoft ecosystem |
| Tarantula | ✅ | ❓ | |
| TestLink | ✅ | ❓ | Open Source Test Management Tool |
| Zephyr | ✅ | ❓ | |
| Nitrate | ❓ | ❓ | Open Source Test Management Tool |
| TestCollab | ❓ | ❓ | |
| QACoverage | ❓ | ❓ | |
| XQual | ❓ | ❓ | |
| Qucate | ❓ | ❓ | |
| TestFLO for JIRA | ❓ | ❓ | |
| JunoOne | ❓ | ❓ | |
| Klaros-Testmanagement | ❓ | ❓ | |
| Bugsee | ❓ | ❓ | |
| QATouch | ❓ | ❓ |
The Winners
To be quick and simple: In my opinion, considering the above requirements, the best test management tool are:
- Qase
- Tuskr
- Testiny
I chose those in order to actually test them. It wouldn't be able with all of the above as I don't have time. Having said that remember that this is not paid by any of the mentioned companies review for my needs only. Your project might be different and have different requirements.
Qase
The advantages:
- Has API integration and plugins for E2E frameworks, I have tested it with Selenium
- The owners reply quickly on github - great maintanance
- 3 people can be part of a free team, great for startups
Screenshots:
Testiny
Screenshots:
Tuskr
Screenshots:
